Compare lynx screw to spector pro Patch#
Compare lynx screw to spector pro upgrade#
Compare lynx screw to spector pro full#

himself has issued the beta disclaimer time and again. For many, myself included it has been pretty straightforward and stable.

I'm sorry you are having such a difficult time.

Compare lynx screw to spector pro full#

From dodgy European service repair to tons of emails full of guesswork from beta champions who made new problems out of not properly finished products. I was happy with my unit first 5 years or so, after that it went downhill. Critical or not, malfunctioning is malfunctioning and it gets on the way. Issues that 2d didn't have because, they said, implementation was lost! Figure that. And I stumbled on more issues after upgrade.

Compare lynx screw to spector pro upgrade#

I was advised by Metric Halo to upgrade my 2d unit to solve some firmware issues. Sounds like beta state is excuse for unfinished work to you. In my book, it's not normal to have such advanced and complex piece of gear with so many bugs and updates on the market for a year. For many, it has been stable and sounding great for a while, but if you need something for mission critical work and it has to have zero bugs, updates, etc., maybe use a product that's not in beta.Really that simple? That's when we resolve bugs, get updates, etc.

Compare lynx screw to spector pro Patch#

I just feel safe with MH and love the workflow and patch bay, just a good set up. I just switched the MH instead and the recording were great with the ADA8200 as well. Just a tough ! I love the ULN-8 but I had the ADA8200 right before on drums, same mics, same spot. I have yet to read ' I can blindly pick A over B, I love it and pick it 100% of the time'.

Not to offend people and their opinions here but i have read so many ' Apollo is slight greenish and raspberry when Antelope is cold and RME is strict, Merging is expensive sounding, Behringer is 2D etc etc' from people in a bedroom on HS80 having owned the tools years appart. So between MH 2d and 3d ? same chip, slightlight revised clock? and we are talking the best noses on the planet, explaining how noble was the supermarket wine. It's like the Eric Valentine clock thread, even Antelope had NEVER done a blind test, and all people raving about the Atomic clock just plugged in: it suddenly felt great, no science no A/B.Įven oenologist begin to feel inspired by cheap wines when stickers on the bottles had been changed. 'we have done A/B blind tests and I could pick A, 80% 90% of the time having more bottom, or deepness' Lots of good infos on forums, but I have yet to read something about converters: This thread, not unreasonably, draws some folks with legitimate problems, some with operator error issues, some who just need some guidance for a specific user case, and others who, well.Īnd to the guy complaining about updates: do a Google search on 'beta version' and see what you come up with. The good thing is that there are thousands of people using MH boxes to get high-quality work done in an astounding variety of configurations all over the globe right now, and having zero problems. I mean, I get it, it's GS, and everyone must be able to hear the difference between things, and the smaller the differences, the more important, right? how do you guys even react when you change the mic position?Seriously.

I'm wondering about the overwhelming and emotional comments on the sound differences here in the forum. There was no difference I would care about. There was a day or two between listening to 2d the last time and 3d the first time. I want to start a third opinion gang: 'I don't care'.